Google's plan, for example, was simply to create a search site that didn't suck.They had three new ideas: index more of the Web, use links to rank search results, and have clean, simple web pages with unintrusive keyword-based ads.Above all, they were determined to make a site that was good to use.
And while they probably have bigger ambitions now, this alone brings them a billion dollars a year.
There are plenty of other areas that are just as backward as search was before Google.
I can think of several heuristics for generating ideas for startups, but most reduce to this: look at something people are trying to do, and figure out how to do it in a way that doesn't suck.
March 2005(This essay is derived from a talk at the Harvard Computer Society.)You need three things to create a successful startup: to start with good people, to make something customers actually want, and to spend as little money as possible.
Most startups that fail do it because they fail at one of these.
A startup that does all three will probably succeed.
And that's kind of exciting, when you think about it, because all three are doable. And since a startup that succeeds ordinarily makes its founders rich, that implies getting rich is doable too. If there is one message I'd like to get across about startups, that's it.
There is no magically difficult step that requires brilliance to solve.
The Idea In particular, you don't need a brilliant idea to start a startup around.
The way a startup makes money is to offer people better technology than they have now.
But what people have now is often so bad that it doesn't take brilliance to do better.